Tax Relief
Americans are being taxed at the highest rate since World War II. The typical family pays 39 percent of its income in taxes at the federal, state and local level -- more than they spend on food, clothing and shelter combined. Senator Thompson believes that is simply too high, and he has been a leader in moving tax relief legislation through the Senate.
Senator Thompson is a member of the powerful Committee on Finance, which has jurisdiction over all tax issues. From this position, he helped write the largest tax cut bill in history ? the Taxpayer Refund and Relief Act of 1999. This bill would have provided Americans with $792 billion of tax relief over 10 years. Specifically, the bill would have reduced the burden on all taxpayers by cutting tax rates across-the-board. It would have provided couples with relief from the marriage penalty tax. It would have provided relief to Americans who have worked hard to build up a business or farm and want to pass it along to their children by repealing the death tax. It would have made the cost of health insurance more affordable. It would also have provided increased incentives for Americans to save for their retirement and their children's education. Unfortunately, that bill never became law, because it was vetoed by President Clinton.
In 2000, Senator Thompson is continuing his efforts to deliver tax relief to hard-working Americans. He has helped draft and move a number of tax bills through the Senate. For example, the Senate has passed the Affordable Education Act of 2000. This bill would help families save for their children's education by increasing the amount they can contribute to an education savings account from the current $500 to $2,000 per year, by allowing education savings account funds to be used for K-12 expenses (such as tutors, computers or uniforms), and by making withdrawals from state and private pre-paid tuition plans tax-free. In addition, this bill would help state and local governments modernize existing schools or build new schools by easing the tax-exempt bond rules.
The Senate has passed a package of tax cuts for small businesses. This bill would immediately increase to 100 percent the deductibility of health insurance for the self-employed, repeal the 0.2 percent temporary federal unemployment payroll tax (FUTA), make permanent the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC), increase from 50 to 80 percent the amount of business meal expenses small business are permitted to deduct, reform the pension laws to make it easier for small businesses to offer an employee pension plan, and allow small businesses to deduct immediately purchases of equipment of up to $30,000 per year.
The Senate has also passed the Patients' Bill of Rights Plus Act, which includes tax provisions aimed at increaseing access to health insurance by reducing the cost of health care coverage. Specifically, this bill would expand Medical Savings Accounts (MSAs) so that they are available to all Americans, increase to 100 percent immediately the deductibility of health insurance for the self-employed, and make long term care insurance deductible.
Finally, Senator Thompson is working to pass legislation that would provide all American couples with relief from the marriage penalty tax. Senator Thompson believes that the marriage penalty unfairly discriminates against hard-working families and should be eliminated. That is why he supports the Marriage Tax Relief Act of 2000, which was passed by the Finance Committee and is now pending before the full Senate. This bill would increase the standard deduction for married couples to make it twice the deduction for a single taxpayer. It would expand the 15 and 28 percent tax brackets for those who file joint returns to twice the income level for single filers. It would raise the income phase-out limit for the Earned Income Tax Credit by $2,500 to remove the marriage penalty for the lowest income Americans. This bill would also provide middle income taxpayers with permanent relief from the alternative minimum tax (AMT) by allowing families to benefit from various tax credits (such as the $500 child tax credit) without being caught up in the AMT.
Senator Thompson believes that the present tax code has become to intricate, too complicated, and, in many ways, simply unfair. That is why he is a strong supporter of both tax relief and fundamental tax reform. By enacting reforms that simply our tax laws and reduce the tax burden on most Americans, Senator Thompson believes we can strengthen our families, stimulate economic growth, help create new jobs, and return some common sense to our system of taxation.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020617213830/thompson.senate.gov/text/taxref.html
TIME TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP
Click a Topic to Read and Research and then scroll down
- 2008 Campaign (2)
- awards (3)
- Commentary (1)
- Federal Law (28)
- Federalism (2)
- Foreign Policy (12)
- Fred Thompson (114)
- interview (1)
- official position (22)
- Qualifications (1)
- Record (1)
- reports (7)
- speeches (3)
- Tennnessee Law (14)
- videos (8)
- Vote Comparison (1)
- writings (32)
Click A Post In The Archive- star=full report. Click topic to bring up in new page
Meet Senator Thompson
Showing posts with label Federalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Federalism. Show all posts
Saturday, April 28, 2007
Federalism- official position 2002
Federalism
The Framers of the Constitution envisioned a federal government of limited and defined powers, with most governmental activity taking place at the state and local levels. This fundamental principle of "federalism," embodied in the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, has been circumvented in recent decades as the federal government has infringed on state sovereignty and concentrated more power in Washington. Senator Thompson has been working to reverse this trend and to return power to states and communities. He has been an independent voice for a smaller federal government, and has cast his vote against measures to federalize what should be state and local issues.
There is renewed interest in the relationship between the federal government, states and localities as Congress seeks to improve the effectiveness of federal programs and determine which programs are best administered at the state or local levels. The federal presence in state and local government is large, witnessed by the fact that federal grants comprise 23 percent of total state spending. However, many things required by the federal government are never paid for by the federal government. Senator Thompson is concerned with the imposition of unfunded federal mandates on state and local governments, which force our nation's governor's, mayors, and other state and local elected officials to raise taxes or cut services in order to pay for them.
The Tenth Amendment was designed to protect states from Washington's big government tendencies ? but this pillar of our Democracy was attacked by the Clinton Administration. In 1998, President Clinton tried to overturn the long-standing Reagan executive order on federalism with a new order that justified federal intervention in state and local affairs. Senator Thompson offered an amendment on the Senate floor, which passed unanimously, calling on the President to revoke his executive order. The new executive order was suspended shortly thereafter.
In June of 1999, Senator Thompson introduced the Federalism Accountability Act of 1999 (S. 1214). The bill was approved by a bi-partisan vote of 12-2 by the Governmental Affairs Committee in August of that year, but did not pass the Senate prior to the end of the 106th Congress. The Federal Accountability Act would have required the report accompanying any public bill or joint resolution from a Senate and House committee or conference report to contain an explicit statement on the extent to which the bill or resolution preempts state or local government law and the reasons for this preemption. The Act would also have established a rule of construction providing that courts would not construe a statute or regulation to preempt state or local law unless the statute or regulation explicitly stated that such preemption was intended or unless there was a direct conflict with state law.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020811185350/thompson.senate.gov/text/federalism.html
The Framers of the Constitution envisioned a federal government of limited and defined powers, with most governmental activity taking place at the state and local levels. This fundamental principle of "federalism," embodied in the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, has been circumvented in recent decades as the federal government has infringed on state sovereignty and concentrated more power in Washington. Senator Thompson has been working to reverse this trend and to return power to states and communities. He has been an independent voice for a smaller federal government, and has cast his vote against measures to federalize what should be state and local issues.
There is renewed interest in the relationship between the federal government, states and localities as Congress seeks to improve the effectiveness of federal programs and determine which programs are best administered at the state or local levels. The federal presence in state and local government is large, witnessed by the fact that federal grants comprise 23 percent of total state spending. However, many things required by the federal government are never paid for by the federal government. Senator Thompson is concerned with the imposition of unfunded federal mandates on state and local governments, which force our nation's governor's, mayors, and other state and local elected officials to raise taxes or cut services in order to pay for them.
The Tenth Amendment was designed to protect states from Washington's big government tendencies ? but this pillar of our Democracy was attacked by the Clinton Administration. In 1998, President Clinton tried to overturn the long-standing Reagan executive order on federalism with a new order that justified federal intervention in state and local affairs. Senator Thompson offered an amendment on the Senate floor, which passed unanimously, calling on the President to revoke his executive order. The new executive order was suspended shortly thereafter.
In June of 1999, Senator Thompson introduced the Federalism Accountability Act of 1999 (S. 1214). The bill was approved by a bi-partisan vote of 12-2 by the Governmental Affairs Committee in August of that year, but did not pass the Senate prior to the end of the 106th Congress. The Federal Accountability Act would have required the report accompanying any public bill or joint resolution from a Senate and House committee or conference report to contain an explicit statement on the extent to which the bill or resolution preempts state or local government law and the reasons for this preemption. The Act would also have established a rule of construction providing that courts would not construe a statute or regulation to preempt state or local law unless the statute or regulation explicitly stated that such preemption was intended or unless there was a direct conflict with state law.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020811185350/thompson.senate.gov/text/federalism.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Fred Thompson
Former U.S. Senator (R-TN)